Thu 1 May 2008
I recently had another article of mine posted in an industry pub. This time it was an article about standards for html email rendering published in Marketing Profs. Ooooh Exciting! Right? Ok, I get it, it’s not really that exciting. But it is important.
Here’s an analogy, because I’m a big fan of those, imagine if every type of car ran on different gas. I’m not talking about different octane, like 87, 89, 93, I’m talking about different types of gas. It would make the cost of gas so much higher because each gas company would have to make so many different types of gas. That would be silly, so much wasted time and effort. If there were just one type of gas then the companies could optimize their process to create one better grade of gas at a cheaper cost.
Well, right now email marketer have to do something similar. They have to try tailor their messages to work in all sorts of different email clients: Yahoo!, Outlook2003, Hotmail, AOL, and two of the worse Outlook2007 and Gmail. If emails rendered the same in more of these clients it would make things a lot more simple.
The impetus for this article was the email standards site, email-standards.org. A great site and a great movement. BTW, I love their project to get GMail to notice them, project grimace, which I contributed to!
I listened in on a webinar from C[ReturnPath]] today. They’re a great company who help others get their email out. Not in the same way as we do at C[Bronto]], they focus more on helping companies deal with deliverability problems, renderability, and more (well we do that too, but that’s their specialty). One good thing that came out of it was a good summary of reputation tracking sources. Most of this wasn’t news, but it was the impetus I needed to throw a few of them up here for those out there who haven’t investigated their rep. This is really only useful to those of you who send email on a corporate level, but it’s still interesting to see how your doing…